Two more finished!
Er, from the to-be-read pile, that is.They have now migrated to the “have been read, but have no room to put anywhere other than in a pile on the floor” pile. Or one of them.
I finished Jonathan Kellerman’s “Bones” the other day before catching a train down to visit my parents (just in time for snow – SNOW!!!). And it was good. He does have an ear for dialogue that is very acute, if overdoing the teen-speak a little at times (to prove he is down with the kids?). And the plot was (hold on a minute while I try to summon it back from the teeming masses in the “someone already used that plot” bin…) pretty tight, and pretty horrific by the time it all unspooled. I did have to snigger at Alex getting the hots for a dentist called “Faye” who looked like Robin (getting a bit meta now? Or is the lady wife creating characters called Jonathan that are hawt too?) but thankfully it was the only incident that was squirm-inducing. It’s a grand ride in what I’d term “vintage Kellerman” style. I liked it a lot more than Michael Connelly’s latest, whatever that says about it (or me).
Then, while I was at home (looking out at the SNOW!) my dad gave me his copy of “The Devil’s Star” which was the only Jo Nesbø book I had not yet read (ooh, I found the symbol for his name (finally!)), and it was most excellent. As I’d read the books out of sequence (ooooops) I knew how one part of it was going to end, but I missed a major twist looming (got caught out by a tan-lines McGuffin at one point), and was surprised how much of the book was left when the case was solved (in crime books that only means the crime is not solved and there’s more to come – it was how much more there was that caught me napping).
I’ve seen people complain about the Harry Hole character (someone called him “whiny” on facebook, which made me boggle) but I think his struggle with booze lends both a gritty realism and a possibility of out-of-left-field responses to problems that makes him a smidge more interesting than your run-of-the-mill plod-in-books. I love the way Nesbø introduces even the smallest (in terms of plot) characters in a way that is tremendously evocative, and makes them stick in the memory, I also loved the opening sequence and the recurring motif it brought up about water and lust both seeking the lowest level. Might sound high-falutin’ but it makes perfect sense in the context of the story. He’s such a smart writer that pieces from the opening sequence echo throught the book (in Waaler’s childhood fears, and in other sequences where water appears) making the whole thing gel into something more than your usual crime-busting book.
There’s so much hype and talk about Stieg Larsson at the moment, that it’s worth re-stating that there are other Scandinavian writers (Nesbø is Norwegian) who deserve every bit as much attention and acclaim. Not to mention the fact, that to this reader at least, Nesbø keeps a very high rate of both consistency and quality from book to book, and his characters are less black-and-white and therefore more interesting than Larsson’s for repeat visits. Yes, Harry Hole is no Lisbeth Salander, but he’s pretty interesting in his own right, and well worth getting acquainted with. Having already read “The Redeemer” (Nesbø’s next book) I can tell you it knocks “The Girl Who Played with Fire” (part 2 of the Millenium trilogy, out now) out of the ballpark in terms of quality – and it’s not even his best book. So if Larsson’s book has kindled your interest in Scandinavian crime – check Nesbø out and find another series to get hooked on.

Recent Comments